2015 (10) TMI 1336
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Advocate For the Respondent : Mr M Rammohan Rao, AC (AR) ORDER Per: D N Panda: The precise case of the appellant as argued is that the goods cleared were meant for the purpose of execution of Drinking Water Supply Project in terms of international competitive bidding (ICB). The goods meant for clearance were of the character and nature covered by the Customs Tariff entry 9801 as has been notif....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ere meant for use in Drinking water supply project as certified by the authorities concerned. 2. When the factual position is as above, Revenue's allegation is that the goods supplied by appellants were not covered by CTH 9801. Ld. DR supports adjudication submitting that the goods supplied by appellant is altogether different and not meant for Drinking water supply project to execute it. 3.....