2015 (10) TMI 1255

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Petitioner : Shri Manjit Singh, consultant For the Respondent : Shri G R Singh, AR   ORDER Per Ashok Jindal :     The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order confirming the penalty of Rs. 15,000/- under Rule 27 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 for contravention of Rule 12(2A) (a) of Central Excise Rules, 2002  for three times and penalty o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....72) ELT 315 (Tri)] for breach of Rule 9(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules penalty can be imposed for each contravention. Therefore impugned order does not require any interference by this Tribunal. 4. Heard the parties. Considered the submissions. 5. On perusal of the record, I find that Rule 27 of Central excise Rules, 2002 prescribe maximum penalty of Rs. 5000/-. Therefore there is no limit for im....