Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Rebate under Notification 41/2012 ST dated 29.06.2012

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ebate under Notification 41/2012 ST dated 29.06.2012<br> Query (Issue) Started By: - Hariharan Sundaram Dated:- 14-10-2015 Last Reply Date:- 23-10-2015 Service Tax<br>Got 2 Replies<br>Service Tax<br>Sir, We have filed a refund claim under Para 3 of the Notification 41/2012 ST (document based rebate). The rebate amount claimed by us is more than the rebate amount as per Para 2 of the said notifica....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion. The department has rejected the same on the ground that as per condition specified under Para 1(c) of the notification we have not fulfilled condition to the extent that the difference between rebate as per paragraph 2 and paragraph 3 is less than twenty per cent of the rebate available under the procedure specified in paragraph 2 since the difference between Para 2 and 3 is in negative. For....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... example, we have filed rebate claim for &#8377; 5000/- as per Para 3 and as per Para 2, the rebate is 3000/-. The department claim is &#8377; 3000 - &#8377; 5000 is -2000/- (negative number ) Kindly guide us whether the department stand is correct or not? pl help me with any orders, clarifications board circulars case law on the issue Reply By Hariharan Sundaram: The Reply: Dear experts pl clar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ify my above doubt. Nobody is answering so far. Kindly help me out of the issue. Reply By TAMAN GILL: The Reply: The department calculation seems wrong because as per condition specified under Para 1(c) of the notification Notification 41/2012 ST. For e.g.:- Rebate claim you filed=Rs.5000(as under para 3), Assume Rebate under Para 2 be &#8377; 3000, Difference=5000-3000/3000 i.e. 67%...i.e. more....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... than 20%...hence rebate should be sanctioned by para 3 i.e. through documents.Please clarify with the department authorities i would recommend.<br> Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing ....