Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2015 (10) TMI 889

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etitioner : Sri Ravi Raghavan & Miss S. Chatterjee, Advocate For the Respondent : Sri S. P. Pal, Appraiser (A.R.) ORDER Per DR. D.M. MISRA Heard both sides 2. This application is filed seeking waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 2.14 Crores and equal amount of penalty imposed under Section 11AC of CEA, 1944. 3. The applicants are engaged in the manufacture of H.V. Gear Box and during the pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ke Quality Control, Packing cost, Administrative Heads etc. are considered on notional basis and de hors the principle of costing accepted and prescribed by the Revenue as CAS-4 method. They have also furnished a certificate from Mani & Co., the Cost Accountant who had certified the method of arriving at the cost of the product by the appellant as correct. The said certificate was later also accep....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 6. Heard both sides and perused the records. Prima facie, we find that the dispute centered around the determination of assessable of the gear box manufactured and supplied by the applicant to their holding company M/s. Tata Motors Ltd. Besides disputing the methodology for determination of value i.e. under Section 4(1)(a) or 4(1)(b) of CEA,1944, the applicant had also challenged the priniples ap....