Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (12) TMI 32

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... over the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). Hence, they have come before the Tribunal for relief. 3. Shri M.S. Bheemasena Rao, learned Consultant appeared for the appellants and Shri K.S. Reddy, learned JDR for the Revenue. 4. The learned Consultant adduced the following points: (i) The goods are commercially known and marketed as bullet proof doors. (ii) Rule 2 (a) of the Interpretative Rules states that any reference to "an article shall be taken to include a reference to that article incomplete or unfinished, provided that, as presented the incomplete article or finished article has the essential character of the complete or finished article. It shall also be taken to include a reference to that article complete or finished (or falling to be classified as complete or finished by virtue of this rule), presented "unassembled or disassembled condition". This criterion is fulfilled in the instant case. (iii) As per Rule 3 (a) of the Interpretative Rule, preference will have to be given to the specific description of the item instead of the general description. In the instant case, the specific description is doors and windows. (iv) HSN Note under CH 70 opines th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....invoice and Bill of Entry wherein we have imported similar type of window and the same is cleared under chapter No. 7610.10 (20% +2 +15%), for your verification. 6. In the circumstances, we request your goodselves to permit us to clear the said consignment under Chapter No. 76 only and do the needful." The fact that the impugned item is bullet proof glass door/window with aluminium frame is not in dispute as this is very clear from the Order-in-Original. The Tariff Heading 7610 reads as follows:   Tariff Item                   Description of goods                                     Unit                Rate of duty                                   &nb....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nbsp;                              ROOFING FRAMEWORKS, DOORS AND                               WINDOWS AND THEIR FRAMES AND                                THRESHOLDS FOR DOORS, BALUSTRADES,                                PILLARS  AND COLUMNS); ALUMINIUM                                PLATES, RODS, PROFILES, TUBES AND                     &....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bsp;   15% - 7020 00 12                         Founts for kerosene wick lamps                                      kg.        15% - 7020 00 19                        Other                                           Glass chimneys: 7020 00 21                         For lamps and lanterns                  &n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y commercially known as plastics and not articles made from plastics along with other material. The Apex Court decided that the classification of plastic torches cannot be covered under Item 15A (2) and it can be covered only under residuary item No. 68 of the Central Excise Tariff. It has been held that an expression used in taxing statute for describing a commodity, it is generally given to a person in the trade or in the market of commodity and in the sense the person conversant with the subject matter of statute and dealing with it would attribute to it. In the Wiltech India Ltd. (supra) case, the Apex Court held that Plastic razor is not wholly made of plastic but of plastic and iron rods not treatable as made wholly from plastic, hence it cannot be treated as "articles of plastic". The Apex Court in the case of Western India Plywoods Ltd. (supra) has held that application of residuary entry should be made with extreme caution, being attracted only when the no other provision expressly or by necessary implication applies to the goods in question. In the Abdul Glass Industry Ltd. (supra) case, it has been held that the identity of an article is associated with primary function ....