Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (1) TMI 766

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Board held that a belated submission of form VAT 47 on notice being issued for non compliance of provisions of Section 76 (2) (b) of the RVAT could not allow avoidance of the penalty under section 76 (6) of the RVAT. The facts of the case are that the petitioner company (hereinafter `the assessee') engages in the business of manufacturing and trading in foundary products and refractories. In the course of its business the assessee purchased crucible goods from one M/s. Vesuvius India Limited, Mehsana (Gujarat) vide invoice No.2090 dated 15-5-2008 for a sum of Rs. 6,56,463/- against C form, wherein the said seller had charged CST at the rate of 3%. In the course of transportation of goods purchased to the works of the assessee the vehic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2008. The order dated 24-5-2008 was put to challenge by the assessee in appeal before the Dy. Commissioner (Appeals), who following the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case State of Rajasthan Vs. D.P. Metals [(2001) 124 STC 611] vide order dated 9-3-2010 allowed the appeal and set aside the penalty holding that as Form VAT 47 submitted by the petitioner assessee on the very same day of checking the vehicle along with the reply to the show cause notice absolved the assessee of any violation of provisions of the 76 (2) (b) of the RVAT Act and thus penalty under Section 76 (6) was wrongly imposed. Against the appellate authority's order dated 9-3-2010, the Revenue filed a further appeal before the Rajasthan Tax Board, which v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gment of D.P.Metals (supra) has been followed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in innumerable cases, wherein the High Court has held that alleged deficiency constituted by a contravention of Section 76 (2) (b) of the RVAT Act in the absence of Form VAT 47 with the goods in transit can be set right with the supply of the Form VAT 47 along with the reply. Counsel submits that the alleged deficiency at the time of checking of vehicle was in the present case removed on submitting the reply to the show cause notice along with a copy of Form VAT 47 duly filled. Counsel submits that the department and the Board could not have ignored the reply of the petitioner assessee along with Form VAT 47 as well as the judgment of the D.P. Metals (su....