Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (2) TMI 1145

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ect in holding that in its earlier order dt. 16th Dec., 2003 where it had held that the fair market value as on 1st April, 1981 of shade trees was ₹ 35 per square feet based on the certificate issued by the competent authority i.e., Dy. Conservator of Forest should be rectified with the value as on 1st April, 1981 by adopting ₹ 75 per square feet as held in one other case by the Tribunal that is in the case of Sangameshwara Coffee Estate ? (2) Whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that the fair market value of the shade trees can be taken at 70 per cent of the sale consideration as on 1st April, 1981 even though it is not based on only facts nor it is based on the similar case wherein the price has been referred for the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rties. 4. The dispute is in regard to value of the timber sold by the respondent-assessee pursuant to permission granted to cut and sell the excess shade trees in the estate of the assessee. The return of income was filed for the asst. yrs. 1998-99 and 1999-2000, The assessee's contention was 70 per cent of the sale consideration received by it has to be treated towards the cost of the timber as on 1st April, 1981, in order to compute the capital gains. But it is the case of the Revenue that it has to be arrived at a cost of ₹ 24.5 per cubic feet. Accordingly, the order was passed by the AO against which an appeal was preferred before the CIT(A), which also came to be dismissed. Against which the second appeal was preferred by th....