Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (11) TMI 604

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Meena, SDR, for the Respondent. ORDER The Commissioner has demanded service tax of over ₹ 1.3 crores from the appellants and also education cess therewith for the period July, '03 to March,' 06 by invoking the larger period of limitation under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. He has also imposed huge penalty on the assessee. After examining the records and hearing both sides, we not....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....so. Accordingly, a show-cause notice was issued by invoking the larger period of limitation and, ultimately, in adjudication thereof, the Commissioner passed the above order. 2. It is the submission of learned Senior Advocate for the assessee that MMR was an amount lying as a deposit with the assessee's principal viz. M/s. SPCPL and, therefore, no part of that amount was liable to be include....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....007 dated 21-5-2007 in the case of CMS (India) Operations & Maintenance Co. (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry [2007 (7) S.T.R. 369 (Tri.) = 2007-TIOL-892-CESTAT-MAD]. Learned Counsel has also claimed prima facie case on the ground of limitation. It is submitted that nothing was suppressed wilfully or otherwise by the assessee, for the department to invoke the larger period of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is case was paying service tax in the category of maintenance and repairs during the period of dispute, albeit by excluding certain elements from the Gross Taxable Value. It is also noteworthy that the factum of exclusion of cost of materials was clearly discernible from the relevant invoices. In the circumstances, prima facie, there is a point in the counsel's submission that there was no suppres....