Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (10) TMI 104

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2. After hearing both the sides and on perusal of records, we find that the Respondent No 1 M/s Banian & Berry Bearing Pvt Ltd was engaged in the manufacture of SS Ingots, SS Flats, an SS Round Bars classifiable under Chapter 72 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act 1985. They were availing cenvat credit on imported Nickel for use in the manufacture of final product. A Show Cause Notice dtd 30th Sept 2005 was issued proposing demand of cenvat credit of Rs. 2.09 crores alongwith interest and to impose penalty on the Respondent No 1 and its Director, Respondent  No 2 herein. 3. By the impugned adjudication order, the adjudicating authority disallowed the cenvat credit of Rs. 1.30 cores alongwith interest  and also i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....relied upon the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana in the case of Rajeev Alloys Ltd vs CCE, Chandigarh [2009(247).ELT.27(P&H)]. He also relied upon the decision of this Bench in the case M/s Agarwal Metals & Alloys & others vs CCE, Vapi [ 2013(2)ECS. 37.(Tri. Ahmd)]. 6. We find that the adjudicating authority disallowed the credits of Rs. 1.30 crores on the ground that the appellant availed the credits on the basis of invoice without receipt of the goods. The Tribunal in the respondent s own case dropped the demand which was upheld by  Hon ble High Court. The relevant portion of the decision in the case of  Shri Arun Verma (Supra) are as under: "6. We have carefully considered the submissions. 7.1 The ma....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....been manipulated. However, the evidence of the Production Manager on whose instructions Mr Chander Pal Singh has reportedly maintained manipulated records has not been taken. Similarly, statements of persons concerned with transportation have not been corroborated. 7.3 The manufacture of substantial quantity of 304 grade finished product and its clearance are not being disrupted. The 304 grade scrap imported is only to the tune of about 142 MTs. Therefore, use of Nickel for manufacture of the balance quantity of 304 grade as reflected in the private and statutory records maintained by the assessee-company cannot be brushed aside. 7.4 No valid reasons have been adduced by the Department to disregard the utilization certificate issued b....