Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (9) TMI 941

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bunal (CESTAT) dated 06.3.2012 by which the appeal no.665 of 2008 filed by CCE, Meerut-I was dismissed upholding the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Customs and Central Excise, Meerut-I dated 9.7.2008. 3. The delay has been sufficiently explained. The delay condonation application is allowed. Since we do not propose to interfere on merits, we have condoned the delay and heard the arguments. 4. On an enquiry made by the jurisdictional Range Superintendent from M/s DSM Sugar Mills Ltd., Mansurpur, it was gathered that a total amount of Rs. 1,69,07,683/- was paid by them to M/s Manoj Kumar Arvind Kumar, the appellants during the period 16.8.2002 to 31.3.2007 in respect of loading, unloading and shifting of sugar bags from the floor of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....shifting of bags in godowns, loading/ unloading of sugar bags/ empty gunny bags, placement of brown/ damaged or wet sugar from godown to melter. The Appellate Authority found that in the definition of 'Cargo Handling Service' under Section 65 (23) of the Act, the transportation of goods is specifically excluded, thus the service provided by the appellant does not fall within the ambit of taxable service i.e. 'Cargo Handling Service'. 7. The Appellate Authority relied upon the judgment of Rajasthan High Court in S.B. Construction Company v. U.O.I., 2006 (4) STR 545 (Raj.), in which shifting of coal from railway wagon to thermal plant by conveyor system was not found to fall within the ambit of Cargo Handling Service. 8. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing of cargo. He submits that the activity carried out by the respondent would fall within the meaning of 'Cargo Handling Service' as taxable activity. The respondent is a partnership firm, which is engaged in the business of handling cargo. Even if the goods are shifted within the factory, the activity would not fall outside the purview of definition of 'Cargo Handling Service'. He relies on the judgment of Orissa High Court in Coal Carriers v. CCE, Bubhaneshwar, 2011 (24) STR 395 (Orissa) in which coal handling agents transporting coal by putting the loads on cars or vessels would be liable to service tax as 'Cargo Handling Services'. 11. Section 65 (23) of the Act defines 'cargo handling service' as follo....