2005 (9) TMI 629
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....wala, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Ajay Saxena, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER The appellants have imported a consignment of textiles and filed a Bill of Entry declaring the goods as polyester dyed fabrics. The goods were cleared on second check and, on examination, were found to contain a higher percentage of texturised yarn not as per the specification. The goods were ordered to be ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d to be excessive over the permissible limits. The subject of request on re-export in such cases, where the goods are not prohibited for import is well settled. No one would like to re-export the goods which the suppliers have correctly supplied. Each case has to be determined as regards the liabilities to confiscation and penalties under the Customs Act, 1962. In this case, the percentage of text....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sible in this case. Since the redemption fine has been fixed at Rs. 80,000/- (Rupees Eighty thousand only) and keeping the facts and circumstances of this case, we would consider that a token penalty of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) would be sufficient on the importing firm and we find no case or cause for upholding separate penalty of Rs. 2.00 lakhs imposed under Section 112(a) of the C....
TaxTMI