2015 (9) TMI 913

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Respondent : Mr. T. Ravikumar JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by V. Ramasubramanian, J. ) This Tax Case Appeal has been admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- (1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the appellant is not entitled to deduction of the provision made in resp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt year under consideration? 2. Heard Mr.P.Venkatanarayanan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. 3. The learned counsel for the appellant conceded that questions of law 1 and 2 are covered against the assessee by the judgment of the Supreme Court in SOUTHERN TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED v. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ((201....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nal has remitted the matter back. Therefore, if permissible in law, it is open to the appellant to take advantage of the finding of the Tribunal. 5. Insofar as question No.3 is concerned, the case of the appellant is that it has a non-banking finance Company which is engaged in the purchase and leasing of commercial vehicles. According to the learned counsel for the appellant, the benefit of hi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... a question of fact, cannot be interfered with. If, after going through the agreements that the appellant has entered into with its customers, the assessing officer considers that the case of the appellant is similar to the decision of the Supreme Court in ICDS, he would certainly grant the benefit to the appellant. But, if it is not so, the appellant may not be entitled. Therefore, we do not thin....