2015 (9) TMI 890
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r Advocate with Mr Pushkar Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr Satish Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel. ORDER 1. The appeal as originally filed was directed against the order dated 11th May, 2015 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate ('CESTAT') requiring the Appellant Assessee to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 78 lakhs for considering its appeal against an Order-in-Origin....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... as well as the CESTAT was the failure by the Appellant to furnish complete particulars despite repeated opportunities. 4. It is not in dispute that the returns in Form ST-3 filed online by the Appellant was rejected by the computer on the ground of some error and was not re-filed till after a Show Cause Notice was issued to the Appellant on 18th October, 2012. 5. The Court finds that the Appell....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI