Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (9) TMI 822

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....These appeals have been filed by the appellant with respect to demand of Cenvat Credit by the Lower Authorities on Mobile Phone Services, Garden Maintenance Services and making of Fencing Services availed by the appellant. 2) Shri Mehul Jivani (consultant) appearing on behalf of the Appellant argued that Cenvat Credit on Mobile Phone Services is covered by the following case laws:- "(i) Muscat P....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of Nirma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Custom Excise and Service Tax Vadodara-I [2013 (32) STR 622 (Tribunal-Ahmedabad)]. It was his case that the Fencing was got done for the additional land for warehouse construction which was adjoining to the factory premises of the appellant and was got included in their registered premises as per FM.V?Misc-99?Regn?Ank-III?06-07 Dated 20/08/2010 written to the appe....