2015 (9) TMI 819

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aushik, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri M.S. Negi, Authorized Representative (DR) ORDER Per. B. Ravichandran :- The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of medicines falling under Chapter 30 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They are registered with Central Excise authorities and are availing benefit of exemption of 1st clearance of Rs. 30 lakhs. The prese....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l No. 60/2001 dated 07/12/01. On appeal by the appellant, the CESTAT vide final order No. A/1063/2002-NB (D) dated 26/9/02 remanded the matter for passing fresh order. The present impugned order is result of such remand proceedings. 2. The appellant contested the impugned order on the ground that the invoices relied on were only proforma  invoices and these invoices also covered generic me....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ines as they carry nil rate of duty. 3. Learned Counsel for the appellant also produced a comparison chart regarding shortages of Ampoules and Vials which were found not entered in RG-1 register and also which were exported through ARE-4. He strongly pleaded that if considered as per the category of the medicines namely generic medicines and PP medicine, the demand could not have been confirmed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....impugned order. He only observed that there is no logic or wisdom of clearing exempted goods on parallel invoices and the appellant also did not raise the issue during investigation. It is necessary to segregate dutiable PP medicines from exempted generic medicines for arriving at the correct duty liability in respect of goods cleared under the cover of parallel invoices. Similarly, regarding shor....