TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2004 (10) TMI 16
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eal, the appellants are required to pre-deposit Service Tax of Rs. 31,45,170/- and penalty of Rs. 1,81,000/. The appellants are based in Japan. They had transferred technical know-how in terms of their licence to their Indian counterpart. Their contention is that they are registered under the Research and Development Cess Act, 1986 which defines Technology. As per Section 2(h) of the Act, "Technol....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ry of consulting engineer services. He submits that the order is not a proper order and requires to be set aside on this ground alone. He further submits that the Mumbai Bench in the case of M/s. Navinon Ltd. v. CCE, Mumbai [2004 (172) E.L.T. 400 (Tribunal) = 2004 TIOL 710 CESTAT-Mum.] has held that the transfer of technical know-how will not come within the category of consulting engineer. He sub....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hey should pre-deposit the amounts as they are not pleading financial hardship. 2.On a careful consideration of the findings given by both the authorities, we are inclined to agree with the learned Counsel that the learned Commissioner has not considered all the 18 grounds in the order. The order cannot be said to be a speaking order. That the appellants are registered under the Research and Deve....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....iod in question, which is November, 1998 to December 2000. As the appellants have shown strong prima facie case in their favour, therefore the stay application is allowed unconditionally granting full waiver of the amount in question and staying its recovery till the disposal of the appeal. Revenue is barred from recovering the same in terms of Larger Bench judgment rendered in the case of IPCL, 2....