Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (10) TMI 16

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the purpose of hearing the appeal, the appellants are required to pre-deposit Service Tax of Rs. 31,45,170/- and penalty of Rs. 1,81,000/. The appellants are based in Japan. They had transferred technical know-how in terms of their licence to their Indian counterpart. Their contention is that they are registered under the Research and Development Cess Act, 1986 which defines Technology. As per ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....now-how falling within the category of consulting engineer services. He submits that the order is not a proper order and requires to be set aside on this ground alone. He further submits that the Mumbai Bench in the case of M/s. Navinon Ltd. v. CCE, Mumbai [2004 (172) E.L.T. 400 (Tribunal) = 2004 TIOL 710 CESTAT-Mum.] has held that the transfer of technical know-how will not come within the catego....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ly fall within the category and they should pre-deposit the amounts as they are not pleading financial hardship. 2.On a careful consideration of the findings given by both the authorities, we are inclined to agree with the learned Counsel that the learned Commissioner has not considered all the 18 grounds in the order. The order cannot be said to be a speaking order. That the appellants are reg....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... be said to have effect for the period in question, which is November, 1998 to December 2000. As the appellants have shown strong prima facie case in their favour, therefore the stay application is allowed unconditionally granting full waiver of the amount in question and staying its recovery till the disposal of the appeal. Revenue is barred from recovering the same in terms of Larger Bench judgm....