Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (8) TMI 897

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rcumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CI&T(Appeals) erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 1.09 crores made u/s 41 (1) of the Act on account of remission or cession of trading liability in the case of TAFE. The ld. CIT(Appeals) erred in not appreciating the fact that TAFE had clamed bad debt on account of the said amount of Rs. 1.09 crores; and without writing off in their books, TAFE would not have claimed bad debt in their Income-tax proceedings for the A. Y. 2003-04." 3. The assessee is a Private Limited Company engaged as dealer of tractors filed its return of income on 23-11-2003,for the assessment year 2003-04 declaring an total loss at (-) Rs. 19,70,649/-. The case was processed u/s 142(1) of the Act and assessment u/s 143(3) r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....contention that the company has yet not obtained any benefit as as the suit is pending is not acceptable as per the information available on records, the TAFE has already written off the liability for the assessee. From the details available on records, it is clear that TAFE has written off the liability of the assessee company and therefore as per provision of the section 41(1) the assessee was required to offer Rs. 1.09 crores for taxation as per section 41(1). The case laws cited by the assessee are differed than the facts of the case of the assessee. Considering the above stated facts, it is clear that assessee has knowingly not offered an amount of Rs. 1.09 crores for taxation for the year under consideration. Therefore, an amount of R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant before the Assessing Officer also. In para 10 of plaint, it was stated by TAFE that this amount was due and payable by the appellant to TAFE for goods sold and supplied. The Assessing Officer also collected from TAFE, ledger account statements of appellant in the books of TAFE from A. Y. 2001-02 onwards, which are available on assessment record. As per these ledger accounts, appellant owed around Rs. 1,39,00,000/- to TAFE as on 31.3.2003. Appellant's debt was not written off in these ledger accounts by TAFE, even though a claim of bad debts was made in its income tax case. It is therefore clear that TAFE had not given up its claim and had in fact filed a suit for recovering the debts. The Madras High Court in the case of India Meters Lt....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessee on the ground that the assessee has not filed any supporting evidence to show the nature of dispute between the assessee and TAFE. However, the ld.CIT(A) has given a finding on fact that as per TAFE's plaint and affidavit in connection with Civil Suit of recovery filed by it in the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in July-2002, amount of Rs. 1,30,28,190/- was due and payable by the assessee. Copy of this plaint and affidavit was filed by the appellant before the AO also. It is also recorded by the ld.CIT(A) that in paragraph No.10 of plaint, it was stated by TAFE that this amount was due and payable by the assessee to TAFE for goods sold and supplied. The AO also collected from TAFE, ledger account, statements of appellant in the boo....