Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (9) TMI 1035

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....asekharan, Member (T) and Anil Choudhary, Member (J) Shri R.G. Sheth, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri V.R. Kulkarni, Dy. Comm. (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER The appeals and stay petitions are directed against Order- in-Appeal No. SB/79 to 81/Th-I/10 dated 29-6-2010 & VSK/(23 to 26)/Th-I/09 dated 20-11-2009 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai. 2. The a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eriod, vide order No. A/187 to 189/2011/EB/C-II, dated 1-2-2011 [2012 (286) E.L.T. 244 (Tribunal)] this Tribunal has allowed the appeal by holding that the physician samples manufactured by the appellant would be liable to duty under Section 4 value and not on the basis of Section 4A value. Therefore, he submits that in the present case also their appeals be allowed. 4. The Ld. Deputy Comm....