Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (6) TMI 3

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cise authorities on 22-2-2001 alleging that the appellant was liable to pay service tax as applicable to "consulting engineer" for the period July 1997 to May 2000. This allegation was confirmed in the adjudication and that order was upheld in appeal by Commissioner (Appeals), Visakhapatnam. A duty demand of about Rs. 2.7 crore and penalty are involved. The present appeal challenges those orders. 2. The appellant's contention was that their agreement dated 14-3-95 was for Operation and Maintenance of a Power Plant and not for rendering any advise or consultancy service. According to them, in terms of the agreement, they are performing the job of operating and maintenance of power plant and the payment is made for that job done and not for ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the operation. According to the appellant, that was again merely a report of performance and not any advice for consultancy. The initial agreement was for a period of operation of 5 years and the agreement also provided for renewal of the agreement. 4. The learned Counsel for the appellant also pointed out that the legal position in this matter remained settled in favour of the appellant by the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex. Vadodara - 2003 (155) E.L.T. 457 wherein the Tribunal held that a work contract cannot be considered as a consultancy contract. Nor can it be vivisected and part of it subjected to service tax. 5. As against the aforesaid contention of the learned Couns....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed to entry and access, to be satisfied that the operation is carried out according to standards. He also receives reports about the relevant aspects of operation, status and output. The payment for operation and maintenance are determined under the various clauses of the contract. In addition to the lump sum payment, it also provides for bonus and penalty. The terms of the contract do not envisage or involve providing any consulting or engineering help to the owner. The operator is fully autonomous and responsible for the performance of operation and maintenance. Whatever engineering issues are involved, it is for the operator to find solutions for, and attend to in the course of operation and maintenance. He is not required to render any ....