TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2015 (9) TMI 256
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tated the facts are that the petitioners run a brick kilns and are engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of bricks. The U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") came into force w.e.f. 1.1.2008. It repealed the U.P. Trade Tax Act 1948. Chapter IV of the Act provides for assessment, payment, recovery and collection of tax. Section 26 under this Chapter provides for assessment of tax for an assessment year. Section 28 provides for assessment of tax after examination of records. Section 6 falling under Chapter II provides for an alternate method of assessment, termed as composition of tax liability. 3. For the sake of convenience the provisions of Section 6, 26 and 28 of the Act are extracted below: 6. Composition of tax liability.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act, but subject to other provisions of this section and the directions of the State Government, the assessing authority may agree to accept a composition money either in lump sum or at an agreed rate on his turnover of sale in lieu of tax that may be payable by a dealer in respect of such goods or class of goods and for such period as may b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....here shall be an assessment of tax payable by him and amount of input tax credit admissible to him: Provided that where the dealer has carried on business during a part of the assessment year, such assessment shall be for such part of the assessment year: Provided further that in case of person who being a dealer other than a registered dealer brings any taxable goods from outside the State, the assessing authority may make separate assessments for each receipt of such goods by the dealer 28. Assessment of tax after examination of Records.- (1) In following types of cases or dealers, the assessing authority, after detailed examination of books, accounts and documents kept by the dealer in relation to his business and other relevant records, if any, and after making such inquiry as it may deem fit, subject to provision of sub-section (9), shall pass an assessment order for an assessment year in the manner provided in this section: - (a) in cases of such dealers as are specified or selected for tax audit by the Commissioner or any other officer, not below the rank of a Joint Commissioner, authorized by the Commissioner in this behalf; in such manner and within such tim....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....credit or reverse input tax credit, or assessment of tax, all or any one of them, as the case may be, are to be made to the best of the judgment of the assessing authority. (4) The show cause notice referred to in sub-section (3) shall contain all such reasons on which the assessing authority has formed its opinion about incorrectness of the turnover of sale or purchase or both, as the case may be, amount of tax, amount of input tax credit or amount of reverse input tax credit: (5) Order of assessment shall be in writing and copy of assessment order alongwith prescribed notice of demand of the balance amount of tax, if any, to be deposited by the dealer, shall be served on the dealer. (6) Dealer shall deposit amount of tax assessed in excess of amount of tax deposited by him for the assessment year, within a period of thirty days after the date of service of the assessment order and notice of demand. (7) Where the amount of tax deposited by the dealer is found in excess of tax assessed, the same shall be refunded to the dealer according to the provisions of this Act. (8) Assessing authority shall not be precluded from making assessment order under this section on the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e. from 1.4.2008 to 30.9.2008, the assessing authority issued a notice intimating the petitioner that the assessing authority was proposing to make an assessment. It was at this stage, the petitioner being aggrieved has filed the present Writ Petition challenging the orders rejecting the compounding applications as well as the earlier orders of regular assessment. They have also prayed that the compounding scheme be declared ultra vires. 7. Thus the issues that arises for consideration in this bunch of writ petitions are as under: I. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the writ petitions challenging constitutionality validity of the compounding scheme dated 9.6.2009 for the season 1.1.2008 to 30.9.2008 are maintainable? II. Whether under the facts and circumstances the compounding for part of the season i.e.1.1.2008 to 31.3.2008 in respect of which regular assessment orders were already passed, can be accepted? III. Whether compounding applications for part of the season from 1.4.2008 to 30.9.2008 may be accepted despite the fact that the compounding under Section 6 of the Act was offered by the State Government for a fixed period from 1.1.2008 to 30.9.20....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ble inasmuch as on one hand the petitioners have prayed for declaring the scheme to be ultra vires and on the other hand they prayed that benefit of the scheme be provided to them for part of the period. Law does not permit a person to approbate and reprobate simultaneously. Petitioner can not accept and reject the same instrument i.e. the compounding scheme dated 9.6.2009. They can not urge on one hand that the scheme is valid to obtain some advantage to which they could be entitled only on the footing that it is valid and then turn round and say that it is void. The impugned compounding scheme is in fact a policy decision of the State Government. 12. It is well settled that the Courts, in exercise of their power of judicial review did not ordinarily interfere with the policy decisions of the executive unless the policy can be faulted on account of malafide, unreasonableness, arbitrariness or unfairness etc. Petitioners have not argued that the policy i.e. the compounding scheme is hit by any of these grounds. If the policy cannot be faulted on any of these grounds, the policy cannot be said to be invalid. Courts cannot question the wisdom of the government in taking a policy d....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... and we are also of the view that so far as the scheme of composition of tax is concerned, the relevant provisions of both the Acts even if not identical, are vastly similar. On the question of the constitutional validity of Sub- Section 6 of Section 17 the same argument was advanced before this Court in the State of Kerala v. Builders Association of India (1997) 2 SCC 183. In that case, the High Court had declared as unconstitutional Sub- Section (7) and (7A) of Section 7 upholding the contention that they sought to levy tax at the rate of 2% on the whole amount of the contract, or at a particular rate applied to the entire value of contract, and not merely upon the value of goods transferred in the course of execution of the works contract as contemplated under Sub-clause (b) of Clause (29-A) of Article 366. The court noticed that the goods which were transferred in the course of execution of works contract may be "declared goods", liable to be taxed under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The goods so transferred may also be taxable under different Schedules to the Kerala Act which prescribe different rates. In such a situation levy of tax on entire value of the contract meant le....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed in Section 14 and 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act; it may also be that sale of some of the goods may also be subject to Central sales tax. It must yet be remembered that the method of taxation introduced by Sub-sections (7) and (7-A) is in the nature of composition of tax payable under Section 5(1)(iv). The impugned sub-sections have evolved a convenient, hassle-free and simple method of assessment just as the system of levy of entertainment tax on the gross collection capacity of the cinema theatres. By opting to this alternate method, the contactor saves himself the botheration of book-keeping, assessment, appeals and all that it means. It is not necessary to enquire and determine the extent or value of goods which have been transferred in the course of execution of a works contract, the rate applicable to them and so on. For example, under Sub-section (7), the contractor pays two per cent of the total value of the contract by way of tax and he is done with all the above-mentioned botheration. The rate of two per cent prescribed by Sub-section (7) is far lower than the rates in Schedules 1,2 and 5 referred to in Section 5(1)(iv)(a). In short, Sub-section (7) and (7-A) evolve a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he assessees to pay tax at a fixed rate on the value of the goods, the property in which was transferred in the course of execution of works contract come into effect in the year 1988 and continued till the year 1996. The appellants had taken benefit of the said scheme of composition by exercising their option for assessment under the composition scheme. They had therefore opted for something different from what is sought to be given to them under the amended provision which levies tax not merely on the value of goods transferred but on the whole amount of the contract. He, therefore, submitted that having regard to the legislative background. amendment of Sub-section 6 of Section 17 with retrospective effect by Act 7 of 1997 is clearly unconstitutional. The submission has no force. If the Legislature has legislative competence to enact a statute and the statute so enacted does not breach any constitutional provision, the same cannot be said to be unconstitutional merely because it is retrospective in operation. Moreover, in the instant case as explained in State of Kerala v. Builders Association of India (supra) the appellants had opted for assessment under the composition scheme.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... there is equality and uniformity within each group, the law will not be condemned as discriminative, though due to some fortuitous circumstance arising out of a peculiar situation some included in a class get and advantage over others, so long as they are not singled out for special treatment. [See: Khandige Sham Bhat v. Agricultural I.T.O. AIR 1963 SC 591] 21. Since in the present case we are dealing with a taxation measure it is necessary to point out that in the field of taxation the decisions of this Court have permitted the legislature to exercise an extremely wide discretion in classifying items for tax purposes, so long as it refrains from clear and hostile discrimination against particular persons or classes. (See: East India Tobacco Co. V. State of A.P., (1963) 1 scr 404, P.M. Ashwathanarayanan Shetty v. State of karnataka, 1989 Supp (1)SCC 696, Federation of Hotel & Restaurant Association of India v. Union of India, 1989 3 SCC 634, Kerala Hotel & Restaurant Association v. State of Kerala (1990)2 SCC 502 and Gannon Dunkerley and Co. v. State of Rajasthan, (1993)1 SCC 364]. 22 Reference, in this context, may also be made to the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in S....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sed on the turn over but on agreement to pay tax in lump sum. The demand is not relatable to the actual turn over. In the case of M/s. Jai Sharma Int. Udyog, Allahabad, Vs. Deputy Collector (Collection), Sales Tax, Allahabad & Others 1992, U.P.T.C. 1161 similar view was again taken. 21. It is settled law that in interpreting a taxing statute, equitable consideration are entirely out of place nor can a taxing statute be interpreted on any assumptions or presumptions. The Court must strictly construe the words of the statute and interpret them literally. It must interpret a taxing statute in the light of what is clearly expressed. It can not imply anything which is not expressed, it can not import provisions from the statutes so as to suffer any assumed deficiency. 22. Thus it is not open for the assessing authority either to bifurcate the period of the season or the lump sum amount under the scheme unless the assessing authority is permitted to do so under the scheme itself or under Section 6 of the Act. In the absence of any such direction or power, the assessing authority committed no error in rejecting the compounding application of the petitioners. In view of the above dis....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ied by us) 24. Again the aforesaid provisions of Section 7-D of U.P. Trade Tax Act was considered by the Division Bench in the case of M/s. Jai Prakash Industries Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and others 2003, U.P.T.C., 1272 and held that it is only when both sides are agreeable then only an agreement of compensation can be entered into between the parties. (emphasis supplied by us) 25. In the case of M/s. Bhadauria Gram Sewa Sansthan, Fatehpur Vs. Assistant Commissioner, Sales Tax, Allahabad and others 2006, U.P.T.C. 538, the full Bench of this Court held that the amount payable under the compensation scheme is not relatable to any actual turnover but depends upon the agreement under the scheme at the option of the dealer. 26. In view of the above discussions, we are clearly of the view that the composition scheme under Section 6 of the Act dated 9.6.2009 could be opted by an assessee/dealer for the season on terms and condition as provided by the scheme itself. The jurisdiction of the assessing authority is confined to accept only such compounding applications which are in accordance with the direction of the scheme. He can neither travel beyond the directions of the scheme ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d 9.6.2009 is valid and the petitioners in whose cases regular assessment were already completed under Section 28 of the Act for assessment year 2007-08 (1.1.2008 to 31.3.2008) were not entitled to apply for compounding. The petitioners were also not entitled to opt for compounding for part of the season i.e. 1.4.2008 to 30.9.2008. 30. In view of the above discussion, we do not find any merit in these writ petitions. All the writ petitions deserve to be dismissed and are hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. ============= Document 1 4141 की संखà¥à¤¯à¤¾ | सीजन वरà¥à¤· 2007-08 में (दि0 01-01-2008 सीजन वरà¥à¤· 2007-08 में (दि0 01-01-2008 से दि० 30-09-2008 तक) के लिठसे दि० 30-09-2008 तक) के लिठनिरà¥à¤§à¤¾à¤°à¤¿à¤¤ समाधान राशि निरà¥à¤§à¤¾à¤°à¤¿à¤¤ à....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....€ अवधि तथा सीजन वरà¥à¤· 2008-2009 में दिनोंक 01-10-2008 से दिनांक 30-09-2009 तक की अवधि के लिठउतà¥à¤¤à¤° पà¥à¤°à¤¦à¥‡à¤¶ मूलà¥à¤¯ संवरà¥à¤§à¤¿à¤¤ कर अधिनियम, 2008 की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनà¥à¤¤à¤°à¥à¤—त ईट निरà¥à¤®à¤¾à¤¤à¤¾ वà¥à¤¯à¤¾à¤ªà¤¾à¤°à¤¿à¤¯à¥‹à¤‚ दà¥à¤µà¤¾à¤°à¤¾ निरà¥à¤®à¤¿à¤¤ ईटों, ईट à¤à¤Ÿà¥à¤Ÿà¥‹ निरà¥à¤®à¤¿à¤¤ टाइलà¥à¤¸, ईंट के रोड़ो तथा राब....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....¤‚क 30-09-2009 तक की अवधि में निरà¥à¤®à¤¿à¤¤ ईटों, ईट à¤à¤Ÿà¥à¤Ÿà¥‹ में निरà¥à¤®à¤¿à¤¤ टाइलà¥à¤¸, ईंट के रोड़ों तथा राबिस की बिकी और ईंटों के निरà¥à¤®à¤¾à¤£ में पà¥à¤°à¤¯à¥à¤•à¥à¤¤ कोयला, बालू तथा लकड़ी के बà¥à¤°à¤¾à¤¦à¥‡ की खरीद पर उकà¥à¤¤ अधिनियम के अधीन देय कर à¤à¤µà¤‚ पà¥à¤°à¤µà¥‡à¤¶ कर के विकलà¥à¤ª Document 3 में à....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ी अवधि के लिठविà¤à¤¿à¤¨à¥à¤¨ पायों के à¤à¤Ÿà¥à¤ ों के लिठनिरà¥à¤§à¤¾à¤°à¤¿à¤¤ समाधान राशि के बराबर निरà¥à¤§à¤¾à¤°à¤¿à¤¤ की जाय । (2) सामानà¥à¤¯ पà¥à¤°à¤•à¤¾à¤° के नान - हाई डà¥à¤°à¤¾à¤Ÿ à¤à¤Ÿà¥à¤ ों के लिये निरà¥à¤§à¤¾à¤°à¤¿à¤¤ समाधान राशि की तà¥à¤²à¤¨à¤¾ में हाई डà¥à¤°à¤¾à¤Ÿ à¤à¤Ÿà¥à¤ ों हेतॠसमाधान राशि 10 पà¥à¤°à¤¤à¤¿à¤¶à¤¤ बढ़ाकर à¤....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....¤°à¤¿à¤¤ समाधान राशि के जमा करने का पà¥à¤°à¤®à¤¾à¤£ के साथ समà¥à¤¬à¤¨à¥à¤§à¤¿à¤¤ कर निरà¥à¤§à¤¾à¤°à¤£ अधिकारी के समकà¥à¤· जमा कर देंगे। विकलà¥à¤ª पà¥à¤°à¤¸à¥à¤¤à¥à¤¤ करने की तिथि किसी à¤à¥€ दशा में बढ़ायी नही जायेगी । (5) सीजन वरà¥à¤· 2008-09 के लिठसमाधान योजना का विकलà¥à¤ª पà¥à¤°à¤¾à¤°à¥à¤¥à¤¨à¤¾-पतà¥à¤° समाध न à¤....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....¤¨à¥à¤¸à¤¾à¤° जमा न करने की सà¥à¤¥à¤¿à¤¤à¤¿ में 15 पà¥à¤°à¤¤à¤¿à¤¶à¤¤ वारà¥à¤·à¤¿à¤• की दर से बà¥à¤¯à¤¾à¤œ देय होगा । (6) समाधान योजना परिपतà¥à¤°à¤¿à¤¤ होने के पूरà¥à¤µ जारी किये गये टैकà¥à¤¸ इनवाइस के अनà¥à¤¸à¤¾à¤° वसूल की गई कर की धनराशि का कोई लाठसमाधान धनराशि में नहीं दिया जायेगा। इसके अति....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....¨à¤¾ निरà¥à¤—त होने के पूरà¥à¤µ टैकà¥à¤¸ इनवाइस से कà¥à¤°à¤¯ करने वाले पंजीकृत कà¥à¤°à¥‡à¤¤à¤¾ वà¥à¤¯à¤¾à¤ªà¤¾à¤°à¤¿à¤¯à¥‹à¤‚ को आई०टी०सी० का लाठअनà¥à¤®à¤¨à¥à¤¯ नही हो सकेगा परनà¥à¤¤à¥ à¤à¤¸à¥‡ कà¥à¤°à¥‡à¤¤à¤¾ वà¥à¤¯à¤¾à¤ªà¤¾à¤°à¤¿à¤¯à¥‹à¤‚ को हानि से बचाने के लिठआई०टी०सी० अनà¥à¤®à¤¨à¥à¤¯ न होने के कारण मांग सृजित हो....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....अनà¥à¤¯ पà¥à¤°à¤•à¤¾à¤° के कà¥à¤°à¤¯-विकà¥à¤°à¤¯ के कारà¥à¤¯ à¤à¥€ करते हैं, तो उनके अनà¥à¤¯ पà¥à¤°à¤•à¤¾à¤° के कय-1 य- विकà¥à¤°à¤¯ पर देयकर इस समाधान योजना से आचà¥à¤›à¤¾à¤¦à¤¿à¤¤ नहीं होगा । (12) कोई वà¥à¤¯à¤¾à¤ªà¤¾à¤°à¥€ जिस à¤à¤Ÿà¥à¤ े के लिठसमाधान योजना का विकलà¥à¤ª चà¥à¤¨à¤¤à¤¾ है, समाधान योजना केवल उसी à¤à¤Ÿà¥à¤ े के ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....‹à¤‚ के समà¥à¤¬à¤¨à¥à¤§ में वाणिजà¥à¤¯ कर विà¤à¤¾à¤— के अधिकारी ईंट à¤à¤Ÿà¥à¤ ों आदि की जाà¤à¤š करने के लिठसà¥à¤µà¤¤à¤‚तà¥à¤° होगें । à¤à¤¸à¥€ जॉच के समय ईट निरà¥à¤®à¤¾à¤¤à¤¾ वà¥à¤¯à¤¾à¤ªà¤¾à¤°à¥€ अथवा उनके कोई करà¥à¤®à¤šà¤¾à¤°à¥€ या पà¥à¤°à¤¤à¤¿à¤¨à¤¿à¤§à¤¿ जॉच कारà¥à¤¯ में किसी पà¥à¤°à¤•à¤¾à¤° का वà¥à¤¯à¤µà¤§à¤¾à¤¨ उतà¥à¤ªà¤¨à¥à¤¨ नहीं करेगà¥....