Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (12) TMI 454

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Respondent : Mr. Joseph Vaz, Central Government Standing Counsel ORDER Heard Mr. M. S. Sonak, learned Counsel on behalf of the Appellant/Defendant No.2 in Civil Suit No.9 of 2007. The defendant no.1 has chosen to remain absent yesterday and today. It appears that the Department of Customs and Central Excise has to recover a sum of ₹ 15,62,020/- from defendant no.1. Defendant No.1 ha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....laintiff i.e. the Department of Customs and Central Excise were kept separately and they would be entitled to take them and deal with them in accordance with law. It was the further contention of the Department of Customs and Central Excise that the Central Government through the said Department of Customs and Central Excise would also have precedence over the dues which defendant no.2 would fetc....