2015 (9) TMI 46
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Per: Archana Wadhwa: After hearing both the sides duly represented by Mr. Rajesh Kumar for the appellant and Mr. Pakshi Rajan for the Revenue we find that the Commissioner vide his impugned order has denied the Cenvat credit to the extent of Rs. 4,70,52,747/- (Rupees Four Crores Seventy Lakhs Fifty Two Thousand Seven Hundred and Forty Seven only) on the ground that the same stands availed on th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Seventy Five Lakhs approximately) was raised against the appellant on the ground of deficiency in various cenvatable invoices. During the course of adjudication, the Commissioner sought a report from the jurisdictional Central Excise Superintendent, who after verifying the documents, placed the same before the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority accepted the said report and reduced....