2011 (1) TMI 1329

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the Respondent. ORDER This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal No. 38/2009, dated 12-11-2009, passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax (Appeals-I & III), Hyderabad. 2. None appeared on behalf of the respondent despite notice for hearing. There is a letter for adjournment of the matter in February, 2011. Since the issue involved ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....enalty of Rs. 5,000/- under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for contravention of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Aggrieved by such an order, the respondent preferred an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner (Appeals) after considering the provisions of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, came to the conclusi6n that the appellant has correctly ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... defaulted period May, 2007 and June, 2007. The Commissioner (Appeals) has followed the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in Lloyds Steel Industries Ltd. [2005 (183) E.L.T. 351 (Bom.)] = 2003-TIOL-145-HC-Mum and also decision of the Tribunal in Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd. [2008 (230) E.L.T. 179 (Tri.-Kolkata)] and in M.M. Silk Mills [2007 (211) E.L.T. 78 (Tri.-Mumbai)]. 6.&ems....