2010 (10) TMI 1019

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Applicant. Shri Darshan M. Parikh, for the Respondent. ORDER The appellant/applicant has filed this Civil Application No. 316 of 2010 for condonation of delay of 265 days caused in filing Tax Appeal No. 1827 of 2010. 2. Tax Appeal No. 1827 of 2010 is filed under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 proposing to formulate the following substantial questions of law for determ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982, though there was part compliance to the order of the Hon'ble CESTAT dated 8-6-2005?" 3. Civil Application No. 372 of 2010 is filed for stay against the impugned order passed by the Tribunal. 4. Heard Mr. P.V. Sheth, learned Advocate appearing for the applicant/appellant and Mr. Darshan Parikh, learned Standing Counsel app....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Application and Tax Appeal, were filed on or about 2-11-2007. Since the applicant was pursuing the legal remedy by way of Special Civil Application and considering the provisions contained in Section 14 of the Limitation Act, we are of the view that the applicant is prevented by sufficient cause for filing Tax Appeal before this Court. We, therefore, condone the delay of 265 days and allow this Ci....