1980 (3) TMI 259
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....A.A.O. Nos. 815-817 of 1977. T. A. Ramachandran and K. Ramkumar for the Petitioner. The Order of the Court was delivered by KRISHNA IYER, J.-Sri Ramachandran, ably assisted by Sri K. Ram Kumar, presented the case of the petitioner for special leave, as persuasively as the facts permit but while we were impressed with the industry and advocacy of counsel, we heartily dismiss this petition. Why hear....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....fter examining the materials, concluded: "We therefore sustain the finding of the Tribunal that the accident had taken place due to the rashness and negligence of R.W. 1 (driver) and consequently the appellant is vicariously liable to pay compensation to the claimant." The plea that the criminal case had ended in acquittal and that, therefore, the civil suit must follow suit, was reje....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... innocent victims do not suffer and drivers and owners do not escape liability merely because of some doubt here or some obscurity there. Save in plain cases, culpability must be inferred from the circumstances where it is fairly reasonable. The court should not succumb to niceties, technicalities and mystic maybes. We are emphasising this aspect because we are often distressed by transport operat....