2004 (8) TMI 691
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nted. Delay condoned. Before this Court a large number of Appeals have been filed by the Haryana Urban Development Authority and/or the Ghaziabad Development Authority challenging Orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, granting to Complainants, interest at the rate of 18% per annum irrespective of the fact of each case. This ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....service and/or misfeasance in public office and that it has resulted in loss or injury. This Court has also laid down certain other guidelines which the Forum or the Commission has to follow in future cases. This Court is now taking up the cases before it for disposal as per principles set out in earlier judgment. On taking the cases we find that the co....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on for so many years. It found that there was no possibility of delivery of possession in the near future. It held that the Respondent could not wait indefinitely. It therefore directed for refund of all amounts paid with interest thereon at the rate of 18% per annum to be calculated from the date of payment till the date of actual refund. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... paid on the principle laid down by this Court in the case of Ghaziabad Development Authority vs. Balbir Singh (supra) no refund can be claimed. Counsel could not explain whether TDS had been deducted before making the payment of Rs. 2,26,470/-. As has been set out by the National Commission in its earlier Judgments and even by this Court, these are ....
TaxTMI