2015 (8) TMI 663

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t : Mr Nishit Gandhi i/b Mr Vipul Joshi ORDER P. C. This Notice of Motion has been taken out by the Applicant for condoning the delay of 1178 days in filing the appeal. 2. The Notice of Motion indicate that the delay is of 740 days. Assessing Officer has filed an affidavit dated 3.8.2015 wherein he has indicated that the delay is 1178 days in filing the appeal. The reason for the delay....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al is right in deleting the penalty levied u/s 271D of Rs. 4,42,000/- even after the establishment of the fact that assessee has violated provisions of section 269SS? (b) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is right in deleting the penalty levied u/s 271D of Rs. 4,42,000/- even when it was established that this amount was credited to the books of accounts....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct Tax (CBDT) has issued Instruction No.5 of 2014 and in line with its earlier Instruction No.3 of 2011 directing the Revenue not to file appeals to the High Court from the order of the Tribunal when the tax effect is less than Rs. 10 lakhs. This Court in CIT vs. Vijaya V. Kavekar 350 ITR 237, dismissed the appeal having tax effect of less than Rs. 10 lakhs in terms of Instruction No.3 of 2011. Th....