2015 (8) TMI 463

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant Y. Ratnakar, Advocate, for the respondent JUDGMENT Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta C. J.- This appeal is sought to be preferred against a portion of the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal dated May 4, 2012, in relation to the assessment year 2007-08, on the following suggested question of law : "(1) Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in directing the Asses....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in the period specified in section 54/54F of the Act ?" 2. In sum and substance, the Revenue has questioned allowing of benefit under section 54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") 3. We have heard Sri J. V. Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant- Revenue, and gone through the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal. 4. In this case, the assessee ha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssee has complied with the conditions provided under section 54 of the Act. In our con sidered view, as the assessee has acquired substantial domain over new house and has made substantial payment towards cost of land and construction, within a period of specified under section 54 of the Act, the assessee said to have complied with the requirements for claiming the exemption under section 54 of th....