1997 (7) TMI 654

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....disputes between the petitioners and the respondents on 23.9.1991. Petitioners have moved application under Section 14(2) read with Section 17 of the Arbitration Act to make the award rule of the Court. Respondents filed its objection to the same. (2) MS.MONA Aneja, who is appearing for Mr. S.S. Sabharwal, Counsel for respondents, has argued that the Arbitrator has misconducted the proceedings ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... apparent on the face of the record nor has misconducted the proceedings. She has further contended that the Arbitrator has discussed in detail the objection of the respondent and has returned a well-reasoned finding and this Court not being a Court of appeal will not reverse that finding unless Court comes to the conclusion that award is manifestly perverse or illegal. What this Court has to exam....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Arbitrator that in the instant case the respondents have levied compensation on the sales tax which is not tenable in terms of the contract. Arbitrator has held the levy to be bad and invalid. Arbitrator has further observed in the award that from the perusal of the documents filed by the claimant that they have filed ST-8 form which clearly indicated that the claimants were not required to pay....