2009 (1) TMI 843
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ER 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. By consent of the parties, petition is taken up for final hearing forthwith. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection of his misc. application arising out of ITA No.3527/M/2003 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'J' Branch, Mumbai on 10/7/2007 ('the Tribunal' for short). 3. The petitioner had filed his return of i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... said Act in respect of the aforesaid gifts. 5. The petitioner carried an appeal to the Tribunal. By order dated 10/7/2007 the Tribunal dismissed the petitioner's appeal. As the order of the Tribunal suffered from various mistakes apparent on record the petitioner filed M.A.No.730/M/07 praying for rectification of mistakes. By the impugned order the said application was dismissed. The main grie....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI