Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (7) TMI 748

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as challenged an order dated 21-8-2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ('the Tribunal' for short) imposing condition of pre-deposit of Rs. 10 lacs to enable the petitioner to pursue his appeal before the Tribunal on merits and to avoid recovery of the penalties imposed by the Commissioner under his Order-in-Original against the petitioner. The issue arises under th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nded off) under Section 114(i) and similar amount under Section 114AA of the Customs Act. The petitioner preferred appeal against such order before the Tribunal. Along with the appeal, the petitioner also prayed for waiver of pre-deposit and stay against the recoveries. On such application, the Tribunal passed the impugned order requiring the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs. 10 lacs upon which, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed confessional statements of the petitioner. No reasons have been assigned for imposing such a heavy penalty on a person who himself is not an exporter but merely a transporter. 3. In our opinion, the Tribunal has committed no error. Firstly, against the total penalty demand of more than Rs. 10 crores, the Tribunal imposed condition of pre-deposit of merely Rs. 10 lacs which comes to just....