Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (7) TMI 675

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ind Dixit, D.R. ORDER Per R.K. Singh: Stay application along with appeal has been filed against primary order dated 26.3.2013 in terms of which service tax demand of Rs. 1,77,67,451/- was confirmed along with interest and penalties on the ground that the appellant had provided construction of complex service [(COCS- 65(105)(zzzh) of Finance Act, 1994] and evaded the impugned service tax by indu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ontractors. It is also seen that the appellant never declared to the department about the rendition of the said service. As per the definition of COCS given in Section 65(91a) there was no doubt that the service rendered fell under the definition of residential complex and the only exclusion there-under is when the residential complex is 'constructed by a person directly engaging any other person ....