2014 (5) TMI 1049

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Appellant. Shri Amrish Jain, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER When the stay application was heard on 10-4-2012 even though appellant was absent, considering that the matter of the appellant was covered by the decision of Tribunal in the case of Madhav Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. v. CCE, Indore-I reported in 2012-TIOL-234-CESTAT-DEL = 2012 (27) S.T.R. 352 (Tribunal), it was prima faci....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... are to recall the order of dismissal of restoration application disposed on 26-11-2012. Even today appellant is absent. Casual approach of the appellant as above shows scanty regard to law. Repeated default to cause appearance clearly shows that appellant is only abusing process of law causing prejudice to the interest of Revenue. 4. While passing stay order dated 10-4-2012, bench has app....