Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (7) TMI 451

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... February, 2006 under section 132 of the Income Tax Act. Notice under section 153A was issued, in response whereof, the assessee filed his return on 19th February, 2007. It is a fact that the assessee concealed an income of Rs. 86,16,319/- for the assessment year 2000-01. Similarly, undisclosed income for the assessment years 2001-02, 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 were there. The assessee made a statement under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The question arose whether the assessee is entitled to immunity from penalty under Explanation-5 to Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The learned Tribunal has answered the question in favour of the assessee. The revenue has come up in appeal. The following question of law was suggested by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by the assessee. He drew our attention to paragraph-6 from the judgment of CIT (Appeals) which reads as follows: "The submissions are carefully considered. The undisputed fact about the difference between the income declared u/s 139(1), additional income offered u/s 132(4) and the assessed income u/s 153A being identical with the income returned u/s 153A as the aggregate of the original declaration of income and the additional income offered for tax u/s 132(4) are tabulated herein above. In my opinion, the language of Explanation is very clear. It provides immunity from penalty in respect of the amount of concealed income admitted during the search in a statement u/s 132(4). In this situation, the Delhi High Court in the case of CIT v. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ome is declared by him in any return of income furnished on or after the date of the search, he shall, for the purposes of imposition of a penalty under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of this section, be deemed to have concealed the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income, [unless,- (1) such income is, or the transactions resulting in such income are recorded,- (i) in a case failing under clause (a), before the date of the search; and (ii) in a case failing under clause (b), on or before such date, in the books of account, if any, maintained by him for any source of income or such income is otherwise disclosed to the [[Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner] or [Principal Commis....