2013 (11) TMI 1545
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....2008. It is not in dispute that when demand of luxury tax for a building consisting of 13 residential apartments came to be made by the Tahasildar concerned, the assessee, owner of the building, approached this Court challenging the same. 2. The charging Section 5A of the Kerala Building Tax Act (the Act for short) contemplates ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ally as luxury tax on all residential building having a plinth area of 278.7 square meters or more and completed on or after 01.04.1999. This clearly indicates that the luxury tax is leviable only if a building is completed on or after a particular date so also if the plinth area of the residential building is 278.7 square metres or more. When it comes to the me....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ne floor, aggregate of all the floors have to be taken as plinth area. However, proviso to subsection (k) refers to nature of residential buildings as referred in Explanation (2) to sub-clause(e). Based on Explanation (2) of clause(e) of Section 2 Government Pleader contends that apart from the building consisting of different apartments or flats, the owner must....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ulating the plinth area, if the intention of the legislature was to adopt the entire Explanation (2) to clause (e) even with reference to proviso to 2(k) there was no need to mention the aggregate area where a building has more than one floor. The very reference to more than one floor of a building would explicitly mean, if read along with the proviso that wheth....
TaxTMI