Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (11) TMI 1545

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... when demand of luxury tax for a building consisting of 13  residential apartments came to be made by the Tahasildar  concerned, the assessee, owner of the building, approached this  Court challenging the same.        2. The charging Section 5A of the Kerala Building Tax Act  (the Act for short) contemplates when the luxury tax is leviable  a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uilding having a plinth area of 278.7 square meters or more and  completed on or after 01.04.1999. This clearly indicates that the  luxury tax is leviable only if a building is completed on or after a  particular date so also if the plinth area of the residential  building is 278.7 square metres or more. When it comes to the  measurement, one has to see how plinth area is ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e taken as plinth area. However, proviso to  subsection (k) refers to nature of residential buildings as  referred in Explanation (2) to sub-clause(e).  Based on  Explanation (2) of clause(e) of Section 2 Government Pleader contends that apart from the building consisting of different  apartments or flats, the owner must further establish the fact that  they are owned....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....legislature was to adopt the entire  Explanation (2) to clause (e) even with reference to proviso to 2(k)  there was no need to mention the aggregate area where a building  has more than one floor. The very reference to more than one  floor of a building would explicitly mean, if read along with the  proviso that whether the building is a single unit so far as  functi....