Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (7) TMI 10

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mr R Bharadwaj, Adv. ORDER The judgment under challenge by the revenue is dated 13th November, 2009 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal pertaining to the assessment year 2006-2007. The Assessing Officer without spending a word, in the computation made by him in his order under Section 143(3) of the IT Act, deducted the interest earned by the assessee from the non-statutory fu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....non-statutory funds was not amenable to an identical benefit under the aforesaid section. Mr. Bharadwaj, learned Advocate, appearing for the assessee submitted that the assessee is a primary cooperative bank and is engaged in the business of banking. He relied upon Clause (b) of Section 5 of The Banking Regulation Act, 1949 in order to show the definition of the expression 'banking' whi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and the interest earned from such investment is amenable for the benefit under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). He contended that there is no reason why a separate treatment has to be given. Mr.Bhowmik is unable to refute any of the submissions advanced by Mr.Bharadwaj. He has not disputed the fact that the assesse is a primary cooperative bank. He has also not disputed the fact that the assessee is engaged ....