2014 (11) TMI 978

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri Satish Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Satish Kumar and Santosh Kumar Jha, Advocates, for the Petitioner. Shri Prabhat Kumar and R.P. Singh, Advocates, for the Respondent. ORDER C.M. No. 18535/2014 in CEAC 96/2014; C.M. No. 18538/2014 in CEAC 97/2014; C.M. No. 18543/2014 in CEAC 98/2014 : Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. CEAC ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of cutting/slitting of jumbo paper rolls which were cleared as such or layered with carbon paper and this did not amount to manufacture and therefore no Excise duty was leviable. This contention, it is apparent from the order of the Tribunal, has been accepted. But the said contention when raised before the Adjudicating Authority, was rejected. 3. The proposed question of law mentioned in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x Appellate Tribunal, only when it does not relate to determination of any question having a relation to the rate of duty of Excise or to the value of goods for the purpose of assessment. Appeals on the said two issues are maintainable before the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the Act. The question whether rate of duty would include the question of levy of duty was decided by this Court in Com....