Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (8) TMI 976

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....interest-free advances of Rs. 75,00,000 given to subsidy company M/s. Parle Sales and Services Pvt. Ltd. The appellant submits that there is no justification in disallowing interest on advances given to subsidy company as the appellant and subsidy company were having business connection with each other and advances was given on commercial prudent. The appellant prays that the disallowance be deleted.          2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) erred in upholding the action of the Assessing Officer in disallowing product development expenses of Rs. 3,49,516." 2. Besides this, the assessee, vide letter dated May 9, 2012, has raised following as additional grounds :               "On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the appellant prays that the hon'ble Income-tax Appellate Tribunal would direct that the appellant is eligible for deduction under section 80-IB and accordingly suitable direction may be given." 3. In so far as ground No. 1, is concerned, learned senior counse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....charges of Bailley packaged drinking water bottles. 2,30,000 Charges for designing performs and green caps. 1,19,516 Total 6,44,382 6. Out of the said sum, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has allowed the first two items and in so far as designing charges of bailley packaged drinking water bottles and changes for designing performs and green caps, he treated the same as capital expenses as he held that they have enduring benefit. 7. Before us, learned senior counsel submitted that these expenditure have been incurred for designing of the packaged drinking water bottles and such design undergoes changes as per the market trend, once in one year or two years. The decision for changing the design of the bottles are done as per the strategies adopted by the competitors and also the market trend. There is no advantage of enduring benefit in changing the design and colour of product and no new product has been launched. Similarly, changes in colour of caps of the bottle for beverages was also on account of giving a new look to the product as per the trend to stabilise the product and its sale. By no stretch of imagination, the said expenditure can be said to be resulting in ad....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....enduring benefit for a brief period. Here in this case, the assessee has changed the design of the bottle and the colour of the cap as is a regular phenomenon to be carried out between one to two years which cannot be held to be for an enduring benefit or major change in the profit making apparatus. Such expenditures are required for either augmenting the sale or to survive in the market under stiff competition. Therefore, such expenditure has to be treated as revenue expenditure and, accordingly, the disallowance as confirmed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) under the head product development expenditure is allowed. Accordingly, ground No. 2, is allowed. 10. Regarding additional ground, learned senior counsel submitted before us that the return of income for the assessment year 2007-08, was filed claiming carried forward of losses, which resulted into "nil" income in the return of income filed. Therefore, the claim for deduction under section 80- IB, was not shown in the computation of income before the Assessing Officer. During the course of the assessment proceedings, it was brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer that the assessee is otherwise eligible for deductio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... said expenditure as capital expenditure instead of revenue expenditure adopted by the assessee." 13. The assessee has debited expenditure of Rs. 45,58,025, on account of "market research expenditure". The Assessing Officer in the absence of any proper explanation, has treated the said expenditure as capital expenditure. However, he allowed depreciation at 25 per cent. on these expenditure. Brief facts, relating to the claim of such expenditure is that, the assessee is in the business of fast moving consumer goods for which the assessee is required to get the data from the market about the market trends and consumer preferences and to decide the strategies while dealing with the competitors in same nature of products. These expenditure include collection of data required from the market and some other expenditures incidental to market study. 14. Before the learned Commissioner (Appeals), the assessee submitted that the market research expenditures are necessary in the line of the assessee's business and they are incurred in the ordinary course of business. The assessee's detail explanation before the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has been incorporated from pages 31 to 35....