Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (4) TMI 836

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arly on 120/150 days D.A. basis. However, in respect of shipments made from 27th July, 1978 covered by 6 bills aggregating to Rs. 22,98,172.20, the foreign Company failed to honour the bills on presentation even after extending the due dates at their request in January and February, 1979." The assessee, in the circumstances, wrote off the aforesaid sum of Rs. 22,98,172.25p. The foreign buyer was declared insolvent on 14th April, 1980 though the proceedings had started on 26th July, 1979. The amount was actually written off on 30th September, 1979 corresponding to assessment year 1980-81. The deduction on account of bad debt, however, was not allowed on the ground that the assessee had failed to establish that the debt had become irrecover....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... The aforesaid opinion was worded as follows:- "The present income-tax law with regard to bad debts makes the position of the assessee extremely difficult. He may write off a debt in a particular year and may claim it and the claim may be disallowed. In the next year he cannot make that claim because it would be urged against him that he did not write off the debt in that year. Therefore, the assessee always finds himself on the horns of a dilemma and it is the duty of the Department to take a sympathetic view of the matter if in fact the debt was never recovered. Therefore, if the debt was not allowed to the assessee in the year of account, there is no reason why the Department should not consider allowing him this debt in the next year w....