Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (8) TMI 948

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i r Sehgal ORDER T. R. Sood (Accountant Member).- The appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated January 24, 2014, of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Panchkula. 2. The grounds raised in this appeal by the Revenue are as under :              1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion amounting to Rs. 53,61,543 but the same was disallowed because the assessee had also claimed the cost of acquisition of assets towards application of money. However, the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed the claim by following the decision of the hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of CIT v. Market Committee, Pipli [2011] 330 ITR 16 (P&H). 4. Before us t....