TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2015 (3) TMI 893
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....acts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in confirming the disallowance of a portion of the weaving charges paid and whether the Tribunal ought not to have held that in the facts and circumstances of the case, no portion of the expenditure can be disallowed? 2.1. The facts in a nutshell are as under: The appellant/assessee is a firm engaged in the manufacture and sale of cloth. The assessee filed its return of income admitting total income of Rs. 9,30,130/- on 1.10.2002. The return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act on 15.10.2002. 2.2. The case was taken for scrutiny and notice under Section 143(2) of the Act was issued. The authorized representative of the assessee appeared before ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lf-serving documents and the signature of one person on the vouchers leads to suspicion that the expenses under the head of weaving charges are inflated. The Assessing Officer held that the claim of weaving charges appears to be on higher side and, therefore, a sum of Rs. 7,50,000/- was disallowed on weaving charges. 2.5. Assailing the said order, the assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), raising a specific plea as under: The Learned Assessing Officer ought to have appreciated the fact that the payment of Weaving Charges is under the wage settlement made between the Weavers Association and the Sizing Mills Owners' Association. Hence the Weaving Charges have been paid based on these and there is no necessit....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... following manner: 2.3. Against this order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Assessee is in appeal before us. The learned counsel of the assessee contended that it is the practice of the trade that weaving charges be paid to one person representing all the weavers. It is also contended that comparing only manufacturing charges is not reasonable and fair and percentage needs to be compared with the increase in turnover also. 2.4. We have heard both the counsels and perused the relevant records. We find that it is admitted that the entire weaving charges paid is backed by payment vouchers signed by only one person whereas actually the payment belonged to various persons. On the facts of the case, comparison by referen....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rs are not acceptable. That has been explained by the assessee and recorded by the Tribunal in paragraph 2.3 of its order to the effect that it is the practice of the trade that weaving charges be paid to one person representing all the weavers. 6. As regards the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), though it looks somewhat logical to arrive at expenses on the basis of average, we are not inclined to accept such a procedure because expenses have been incurred and reflected in the books of account and, therefore, the same should be either accepted or rejected on the basis of specified data or parameters. The law of averages adopted by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) cannot be held to be justifiable, as in the case o....