Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (2) TMI 1349

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....L ORDER (Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Revenue is in Appeal, seeking reference of following substantial questions of law :- [A] "Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in reversing the order passed by the CIT [Appeals] and thereby deleting the job charges of Rs. 9,68,627/= made under Section 40A(2)(b)? [B] Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as those of the Assessing Officer and CIT [A], from which appeal over the Tribunal arose to contend that the CIT [A] held those issues in favour of the Revenue. On the other hand, counsel for the assessee submitted that the issue in both the years arises out of the identical facts. In fact, in the year under consideration, in the present appeal, the assessee had claimed limited benefit as compared....