2015 (2) TMI 389
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....i V P Batra, AR ORDER Per Ashok Jindal : The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein inputs service credit attributable to taxable as well as exempted services has been denied to the appellant. 2. Brief facts of the case are that appellant is a output service provider as well as engaged in the activity of trading during the period April, 2005 to March, 2010. Audit too....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....at the explanation came on 1.4.2011 and as per explanation trading activity was treated as exempted services. As prior to 1.4.2011, the trading activity was not exempted service, therefore, appellant was under bonafide belief that they are entitled to take Cenvat credit in full, therefore they have taken the credit of Rs. 4,10,320/-. He further submits that if at all Cenvat credi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ant is required to reverse the Cenvat credit to the tune of Rs. 4,10,320/-. If at all there is any calculation mistake, the matter may be remanded back to the adjudicating authority. 5. Heard the parties. Considered the submissions. 6. On merits, there is no dispute between parties as both are relying on the decision of Orion Appliances Ltd. (supra). Therefore I hold that appellant is not en....
TaxTMI