Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (2) TMI 386

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....licant filed this miscellaneous application for extension of period of stay granted vide Stay Order No.S/1013-1014/WZB/AHD/ 2010, dt.23.08.2010. 2. The Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s Haldiram India Pvt.Ltd. & others Vs Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax - 2014-TIOL-1965-CESTAT-DEL-LB, held that the Stay Order passed by the Tribunal may be extended after considering the ne....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., extension of stay could be granted (beyond the period of 365 days) by passing a speaking order disclosing the satisfaction of the Tribunal as to absence of any delay/protractive stratagems by the appellant/assessee resulting in non disposal of the appeal or that the appeal could not be disposed of on account of pendency of several appeals or other reasons attributable to the structure and contex....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....limitations of CESTAT. 21. The reference is answered as above.  All the present applications/ appeals shall be listed before the appropriate Bench having the roster, for disposal on merits." 3. None appeared for the applicant.  It is contended by  the applicant in their application that the appeal was not taken up for hearing after passing of the Stay Order.  4. On the other....