Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2015 (2) TMI 311

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i Amresh Jain, DR ORDER Per Shri R.K. Singh : The appellants have filed the appeal against the Order-in-Original No.COMMISSIONER/RPR/35/2010, dated 03.05.2010 in terms of which a duty demand of Rs. 7,87,18,207/- for the period December, 2004 to March, 2007 has been confirmed along with interest and equal amount of penalty under the Finance Act, 1994. An amount of Rs. 3,46,33,141/- already depos....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....een building, security house, watch tower, boundary wall, etc. and other miscellaneous auxiliary buildings/ structures, etc. and the major construction material, i.e., steel (reinforcement & structural) required for the purpose had been supplied/provided by M/s. BHEL to the appellants free of cost and remaining materials such as cement, sand aggregates, bricks, etc. and equipments, tools, spares, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Larger Bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of Bhayana Builders (P) Ltd. Vs. CST, Delhi [2013 (32) STR 49]. The ld. Departmental Representative conceded that the said judgment is applicable to the case. 4. We have considered the contentions of the appellants.  As regards the contention that as the service was rendered under a work contract, the same is not liable to service tax pri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of industrial and commercial complexes and contract for construction of complexes and in case of composite contract, the service element should be bifurcated and ascertained and then taxed." The Hon'ble High Court goes further to add that:- "the contention that there was/is no valid levy or the charging section is not applicable to composite contracts under clause (zzzq) and (zzzh) of section 65....