Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (2) TMI 10

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ar carried on manufacturing of bricks and SW pipes. It had filed its return of income declaring loss of Rs. 2,87,978/-. The assessment was completed at a total income of Rs. 23,33,502/-, inter alia, making addition of Rs. 2,72,917/- on account of unexplained unsecured loans. 2.1. Consequent to Tribunal's order dated 10-7-2009, except the addition in respect of interest income on FDR amounting to Rs. 4966/-, all other additions were deleted. The AO gave effect to Tribunal's order vide his order dated 30-12- 2010. The AO initiate d penalty proceedings on 6-4-2008 u/s 271D on the ground that assessee company had taken unsecured loan in cash from following persons and while doing so had violated the provisions of section 269SS. S. No. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ce to section 275(1)(c) and not section 275(1)(a). In view of the above the penalty u/s 271D should be deleted." 3.1. Ld. counsel for the assessee pointed out that t he assessment order was passed on 28-2-2005 and penalty notice was issued on 6-4-2008 and the penalty order was passed on 4-6-2008. He, therefore, submitted that limitation is to be reckoned from 28-2-2005 when the AO passed the assessment order and not from 6-4-2008. He submitted that the penalty order is barred by limitation u/s 275(1)(c). 4. We have considered the submissions of both the parties and have perused the record of the case. Admittedly, the AO has not initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271D while passing the assessment order on 28-2-2005 and the penalty proceedi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r 2001-02 are contained, which is as under: Name Date Amount Total 1.  Kamlesh Dagar 5-9-2001 5000.00     7-9-2001 10000.00     10-9-2001 10000.00 25000.00 2. T.S. Dagar 29.8.2001  10000.00     1.9.2001 10000.00     2.9.2001 10000.00     3.9.2001  10000.00     10.9.2001 5000.00     11.9.2001 15000.00     25.9.2001 15000.00 75000.00 3. Ranbir Singh 1.10.2001 10000.00     5.10.2001 10000.00   4. Surendra Singh 15.6.2001 2197.00     3.7.2001 10000.00 ....