2015 (1) TMI 487
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Mr Gopalakrishna Gokhaley JUDGEMENT Per: Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench at Bangalore, dated 6th June 2013 and sought to be admitted on the following suggested questions of law: (a) Whether the Hon'ble CESTAT, Bangalore is justified in relyin....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....amendment to the Act? (d) Whether the Hon'ble CESTAT is correct in opining that the demand of Rs. 2,23,16,485/- for the year 2010-11 does not sustain on account of non-issuance of SCN to the appellant, in fact various citations of various judicial flora have been looked into it by the Ld. Commissioner, while passing the order-in-original and which can be noted from the pa....
TaxTMI