Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (1) TMI 431

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....8 was completed in summary at an income of Rs. 1,99,613/-. It apparent from the records that the during the financial year 2006-07, the assessee has earned capital gain of Rs. 2,69,47,709/- out of which Rs. 2,55,56885/- was claimed exempted u/s 54 by investing in residential property and remaining portion was set off against brought forward capital loss. It is observed that the property transferred by the assessee was agriculture land not a residential property. Therefore, the capital gain arising out of it is not eligible for exemption u/s 54. The same has resulted in under assessment of taxable income of Rs. 2,55,56,885/-. In view of the above facts, I have reason to believe that an income of Rs. 2,55,56,885/- has escaped assessment with....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ncome, the assessee had disclosed sale consideration of Samalkha property and had also disclosed having purchased a residential property at Vasant Vihar and 50% share in a DLF house for claiming exemption under Section 54 of the Act. It is not understood on what basis the Assessing Officer assumed that Samalkha property was agricultural land. The property was located in Rajokri in the National Capital Territory of Delhi and had a built-up area of 3,605 sq. ft. and was also subjected to property tax. The records reveal that on 21st October, 2011, the assessee had informed the Assessing Officer that they had sold the said property and had enclosed the papers including his wealth tax return, house tax notice, valuation report, etc. and also th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....these reasons in writing. The reasons so recorded should have some basis or support and not a mere gossip. The reasons cannot be a mere pretence and should be held in good faith. The expression "reasons to believe" predicates a belief which is founded and induced by existence of palpable or cogent material or information. Reason to suspect cannot amount to reason to believe. As it is the beginning of the inquiry, having a prima facie opinion is sufficient; and irrebuttable conclusive evidence or finding is not required. But the prima facie formation of belief should be rational, coherent and not ex facie incorrect and contrary to what is on record. As noticed in paragraph 3 above, the facts recorded are incorrect. Secondly, the reasons must....