Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (11) TMI 609

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hammed Kutty, Senior Advocate and P.N. Damodaran Namboodiri for the respondent JUDGMENT Writ appeal is filed by the State challenging the impugned judgment of the learned single judge [2012] 51 VST (St.) 243 declaring reassessment completed under section 25 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act as invalid for the reason that a personal hearing is not granted to the respondent. We have heard the lear....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....points and complete the assessments as per the books of accounts regularly maintained. Otherwise I will suffer irrevocable damage and injury." The question whether a personal hearing is required on the written reply filed is a matter of choice of the dealer against whom proceeding is initiated under section 25. Therefore, on receipt of notice under section 25 the dealer is free to file detai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d above, we notice that inspite of the specific opportunity granted for hearing the respondent has neither availed nor requested for a posting for hearing. On the other hand, he left it to the officer to decide the matter after considering his objections filed in writing. We, therefore, do not find any justification for the single judge to interfere with the assessment order on the ground of viola....