Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (12) TMI 1133

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Respondent. ORDER The demand for Service Tax of Rs. 2,43,11,985/- with interest has been made against the appellant and penalties have also been imposed. 2. As regards the demand raised towards "site clearance and preparation service" amounting to Rs. 77,83,916/- and in respect of "erection commissioning or installation services" for Rs. 1,34,93,000/-, we find that the appellant had....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the appellants. We find that unless the procedure as prescribed under the relevant rules is followed, according to which the appellant was required to opt for composition scheme before making the payment of tax, they cannot avail the benefit. Under these circumstances, the claim for composition scheme may not be admissible to appellants at all. Hence, we find that appellant has not made out a case....